Mmcp.market

Head to head

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs runx

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewallio.github.alexar76/warden
A
No reviews yet

MCP security firewall: vet tool definitions before they reach the model.

Full listing
runxai.runx/runx
A
No reviews yet

The governed runtime for agent skills. Search the catalog and inspect a skill before running it.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 88 out of 100). runx is hosted and callable through the gateway; WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall runs on your own machine. runx has noticeably more public adoption.

 WARDEN — MCP Security Firewallrunx
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A88/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars091
Downloads / week51–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools62
Write actions2—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-052026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

WARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs MCPWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs HOL GuardWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs DvalincodeWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs ProjectmemWARDEN — MCP Security Firewall vs LockstepAll AI and agents servers