Head to head
MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Static AST security scanner detecting command injection, leaked secrets, and SSRF in MCP tools.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (86/100 against 75). MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine.
| MCP Security & Vulnerability Auditor | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 778 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Security | Security |