Head to head
b/cited vs Trooth
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AEO tools: scan any URL for AI-citation readiness, read the public leaderboard and citation panel.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Look up a witnessed Trust Profile, read a domain's security surface, or verify a Trust Ledger Token.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trooth (85/100 against 76). Trooth has noticeably more public adoption.
| b/cited | Trooth | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B76/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | 4 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Security | Security |