Head to head
Pentest vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (86/100 against 73). Pentest is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine.
| Pentest | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 116 | 778 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Security | Security |