Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DB Access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing
DB Accessio.github.Rheopyrin/db-access-mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for Postgres/MySQL/Redshift/SQL Server over SSH/SSM tunnels with secret providers.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DB Access (92/100 against 68).

 PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)DB Access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC68/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars30
Downloads / week9153
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-202026-09-07
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DBHubPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQLPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs StackQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Magic CloudPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers