Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs StackQL MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)io.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardened
C
No reviews yet

Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.

Full listing
StackQL MCP Serverio.github.stackql/stackql-mcp
A
No reviews yet

SQL-native query and provisioning engine for cloud infrastructure, served over MCP.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours StackQL MCP Server (90/100 against 68).

 PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)StackQL MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC68/100A90/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars3991
Downloads / week91–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-202026-09-20
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DB AccessPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs DBHubPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQLPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Magic CloudPostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers