Head to head
Phosphor vs uploads.sh
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hosts, metrics, Docker and authorized_keys over a macOS terminal's live SSH connections
Full listing
No reviews yet
Host files from coding agents; stage on a branch and attach to GitHub PRs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 92 out of 100). uploads.sh is hosted and callable through the gateway; Phosphor runs on your own machine. uploads.sh has noticeably more public adoption.
| Phosphor | uploads.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 19 |
| Downloads / week | – | 449 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-02 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |