Head to head
Sema vs Context7
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP tools for Sema — eval, compile, build, format, and docs for a Lisp with LLM primitives.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Context7 (90/100 against 78). Context7 is hosted and callable through the gateway; Sema runs on your own machine. Context7 has noticeably more public adoption.
| Sema | Context7 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B78/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 51 | 62k |
| Downloads / week | – | 618k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |