Head to head
StackQL MCP Server vs Combined
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SQL-native query and provisioning engine for cloud infrastructure, served over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Query synced business data with scoped, read-only SQL and freshness through MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours StackQL MCP Server (90/100 against 70). Combined is hosted and callable through the gateway; StackQL MCP Server runs on your own machine. StackQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| StackQL MCP Server | Combined | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A90/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 991 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |